A new layer of financial scrutiny is reshaping the way thousands of Africans approach traveling to the United States, as Washington requires citizens of 30 African countries to post a refundable security bond, when applying for certain business and tourist visas at the US embassy.
Under the current US visa-bond regime, applicants from affected countries who are otherwise eligible for B-1/B-2 visas may be required to provide a bond of $5,000, $10,000 or $15,000, with the amount determined by a consular officer at the time of the interview. The U.S. Department of State says the measure is aimed principally at countries associated with high visa-overstay rates, deficiencies in screening and vetting information, or other concerns identified under the programme.
The 30 African countries currently on the list are Algeria, Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burundi, Cabo Verde, Central African Republic, Côte d’Ivoire, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Gabon, The Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Lesotho, Malawi, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, São Tomé and Príncipe, Senegal, Seychelles, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe. The policy’s central core, is about a longstanding immigration concern; what happens after a visitor enters the United States.
The Department of Homeland Security’s 2024 overstay data show why the issue has become politically significant in Washington. Several countries now subject to the bond recorded comparatively high B-1/B-2 overstay rates. Angola, for example, recorded a 14.43% total overstay rate among the relevant admissions in the DHS table, while Benin recorded 12.34% and Cabo Verde 13.64%. The figures include suspected in-country overstays and therefore do not mean that every person counted was confirmed to have deliberately violated U.S. immigration law.
Washington’s request for visa bond, is designed as a financial incentive for compliance. It shifts part of the risk associated with non-return, from the American immigration system to travelers. If travelers comply with the terms of the visa bond scheme, the money gets to be returned. If a traveler overstays or violates the conditions, the bond gets forfeited. This logic is straightforward from the government’s perspective. But on ground, the policy raises a more difficult concern: does nationality status proofs that a traveler will be non-compliant to the American immigration system, or be a violator of the US visa regulations?
Earmarked for an affluent traveler is a $5,000 or $15,000 refundable deposit, which may be an inconvenience. To some small-business owners, young professionals, traders, student-supported family or middle-class household in Africa, it can represent months or even years of savings before their recipient can apply for B-1/B-2 visas. The discrepancy is very important, because a refundable bond can still function as a major barrier. Money that is technically recoverable, is money that must first be available. So the people behind the policy idea, should bear a vast sense of consideration in mind.
Consider a Nigerian entrepreneur who wants to attend a trade exhibition in New York, a Ghanaian family hoping to visit relatives, or an African medical specialist invited to a professional conference in the United States… The visa application itself does not guarantee entry. Now, for applicants selected for the bond requirement, access to the visa process will also require substantial capital to be temporarily locked away. Sensitively, this creates a two separate levels or ranks of reality; meaning those with significant disposable funds, may be able to sustain their travelings to the States. Whereas, legitimate applicants with modest incomes, may simply abandon their dreams of touring America for any reason.
Continue reading with Eandel
Subscribe to unlock the complete story and receive your subscriber benefits.
