Trump’s ‘Donroe Doctrine’ Inspired by a 200Years Old Foreign Policy: What It Means on the Ground

When President Donald Trump described the U.S. operation that led to the removal of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, he framed it as more than a single foreign-policy decision. He said it was the revival and reinvention of a 200 years old idea. Standing before reporters at his Mar-a-Lago resort, Trump announced what he called the “Donroe Doctrine,” a pointed rebranding of the Monroe Doctrine that has shaped US relations with the Western Hemisphere since 1823.

The original Monroe Doctrine, introduced by President James Monroe, warned European powers against colonizing or interfering in the Americas. Trump argues that his administration is restoring that principle for a new era. Which is sparked by rival powers according, illicit networks and strategic competition close to US borders, according to him.

“Under Maduro, Venezuela welcomed foreign adversaries into our region” Trump said, alleging the presence of hostile actors and weapons systems that posed a threat to U.S. lives and interests. Such actions, he argued, violated “the core principles of American foreign policy” stretching back more than two centuries. “We’ve superseded it by a lot,” he added. “They now call it the – Donroe Doctrine”. The White House’s message was quickly reinforced by the State Department, with a post on X: “This is OUR Hemisphere, and President Trump will not allow our security to be threatened”.

Trump’s invocation of the Monroe Doctrine is not new. A portrait of James Monroe hangs near the president’s desk in the Oval Office, and references to the doctrine have appeared repeatedly in Trump-era speeches and strategy documents. On the doctrine’s anniversary last December, Trump praised Monroe’s “bold policy” and announced a new “Trump Corollary,” later detailed in a national security strategy focused heavily on the Western Hemisphere.

What distinguishes this moment, analysts say, is the administration’s willingness to pair historical language with direct action, and to present those actions as both protective and transformative.

Supporters within the administration argue the approach advances US security while opening space for democratic transitions and economic recovery in countries long plagued by corruption and repression. In Venezuela, officials have emphasized humanitarian goals, pointing to years of shortages, mass migration, and political crackdowns. “The goal is stability and a safe, orderly transition”, Marco Rubio – Secretary of State said, stressing that Washington intends to use economic leverage rather than direct governance.

However, critics are warning that the language of doctrine can obscure the realities of intervention. As for many in Latin America, the Monroe Doctrine is remembered less as a shield against imperialism and more as a justification for it. The long shadow of 1823 policy.

Continue reading with Eandel

Subscribe to unlock the complete story and receive your subscriber benefits.

Subscribe Now Sign in

Continue reading with Eandel

Stay Informed. Be Part of the Story.